Hegel's concept about Absolute Idea (unity of subjective & objective Idea) is quite in line with अद्वैत तत्त्वत्ज्ञान. While explaining the system around us, Hegel used the terms "Real Reality" (अक्षर world) & "Apparent Reality" (क्षर world). By analyzing Hegel's opinion that history develops as per the logical plan, we can say, "Hegel had mistaken apparent reality for real reality". What he called as real reality was actually the determinists' zone. Though he claimed to have traversed the entire field, it is quite clear that Hegel could not see the endpoint of the desert shown in the Hollywood film "Adventures of Priscila, Queen of Desert".
"The new world order" system (a combination of Snob society & Republic society) which is in place for the last 44 years, is precisely the same nonscientific racist nonsense which was overthrown by Europe during Age of Reason. (the term racism means a nexus between forward racism upper cocks i.e., कौरवांचं साम्राज्य & reverse racism uppercocks i.e., कंसाचं साम्राज्य.) Racists' urge to project themselves as limit of manliness, prompts them to label Queens of desert as eunuchs. Just look at the list of eunuchs prepared by these racist morons & you will be proud to be Queen of desrt -- Mozes, Hegel, Hitler, Alexander, संत ज्ञानेश्वर, हनुमंत महाबळी... almost anyone who doesn't want to deviate from TRUTH gets labeld as eunuch by these mediocre racists. Apart from cowardice & inefficiency, there is nothing in the genes of these racists. These are the stupid talkative extroverts who were running hither & thither when Hitler's battletanks were chasing them. These are the great soldiers who ditched Alexander for gaining favours from Dariyas.
Posts
2 comments:
It is quite likely that Hegel adopted eastern notions of philosophy.
It is certainly the case with Schopenhauer as he specifically mentions it.
Unfortunately this led Hegel down a path that was to unpack all the good Kant did, and it was not until the late 19thC that philosophy got back on track.
Reply to Anonymous comment1 :
Thanks for the interest you have shown in this topic.
Neither Kant nor Bertrand Russel could throw any light on the inexplicable force behind uncertainties around us.
Kant's obsession with anti-reactionary stand introduced many flaws in his theory. Liberal Kant placed too much of emphasis on empirisism & today we can see that empiricism has unanimously voted against liberalism. Mere denial of existence of God has become the only sign of liberalism.
Conservatives have absolutely no problem in dealing with this fallout of Kant's theory. Hinduism also can easily handle that through निर्गुण उपासना (a variant of deism)...
Post a Comment
We strongly believe in Freedom of Expression. So, comments or criticism in abusive language also is allowed here.
(of course we retain the authority to delete SPAM !)